LewishamNews

Anger over plan to ban through-traffic in some Lewisham streets

Residents are fuming that they were “not properly consulted” about their roads being blocked in a bid to force people to walk, cycle or take a bus.

Lewisham council was accused of putting some people’s lives over others at a heated assembly meeting on Thursday (January 15).

A number of roads in Lee Green will be blocked off to through traffic in a trial – with a date yet to be set – as part of the Lewisham and Lee Green Healthy Neighbourhood plan.

At the Lewisham central assembly meeting on the topic, which drew a crowd of at least 100 people, the council was criticised for a “lack of consultation” and information received about the scheme.

Many people were from Hither Green, with one person saying the ward would be “cut in half” by the plans.

But a council officer said the trial “was the consultation,” and appeared to blame Royal Mail for not yet delivering letters.

The latest version of the scheme involves 11 barriers, called modal filters, which will close off the roads so that only cyclists and pedestrians can get through.

The plan no longer involves blocking five streets along Manor Lane after concerns were raised about increased traffic along the road and Manor Park; these include Taunton Road, Effingham Road, Handen Road, Micheldever Road and Southbrook Road.

According to the latest draft, two barriers will be placed in Manor Lane by Kellerton Road and past Southbrook Road, one in Dermody Road by the junction of Wisteria and Pascoe Road, another in Ennersdale Road near the junction with Pascoe Road, and another in Leahurst Road past the junction with Ennersdale Road.

Leyland Road will be blocked off near where it meets Leegate, Cambridge Drive near the junction with Eltham Road, Upwood Road between Cambridge Drive and Horn Park Lane, Woodyates Road by the junction with West Horne Avenue, and Holme Lacey Road and Dallinger Road would both have barriers near Burnt Ash Hill.

Citing the millions of journeys taken in London, Nick Harvey, a senior transport planner at Lewisham council, said the borough’s healthier neighbourhoods programme looked to encourage sustainable modes of transport, improve air quality and safety on local roads and reduce rat-running.

He told the assembly: “We believe that healthier neighbourhoods is a radical solution but is also one that can work and has worked in other parts of London.”

People voiced their frustration about not being involved in the initial consultation, but Mr Harvey said when the council first liaised with residents it was “community engagement” rather than a consultation.

He said: “I completely accept that there’s not been a clear message on what’s community engagement and what’s consultation.

“What we have done is engaged some of the community. We have some raw data, we wanted to understand what local people felt in the area and so we ran some community engagement based around getting people’s feeling for the area and their issues around traveling and around their streets.”

He said one of the main issues raised was concerns about pollution and that stakeholder workshops were held to look at solutions to that and rat-running.

“That is where our concept design with the modal filters came from.

“Rest assured we won’t be passing any scheme that can’t pass the resilience test of TfL.”

But residents remained unconvinced, with one, who lives in Morley Road, saying the plans would mean to “get anywhere” she would have to “drive the entire circuit of the scheme”.

She added that she “did not trust TfL’s planning because it has essentially made my road a rat-run” after it took away the left turn in to Courthill Road.

Another resident said the plans would just “push traffic to another area in Lewisham”.

Mr Harvey said: “This is a borough-wide proposal so it’s not like we’re just coming in, doing whatever, and then leaving. Ideally, we will keep rolling the scheme.”

He added that during the trial the council will be monitoring the impact on surrounding roads.


Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Everyone at the South London Press thanks you for your continued support.

Former Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick has encouraged everyone in the country who can afford to do so to buy a newspaper, and told the Downing Street press briefing:

“A FREE COUNTRY NEEDS A FREE PRESS, AND THE NEWSPAPERS OF OUR COUNTRY ARE UNDER SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL PRESSURE”

If you can afford to do so, we would be so grateful if you can make a donation which will allow us to continue to bring stories to you, both in print and online. Or please make cheques payable to “MSI Media Limited” and send by post to South London Press, Unit 112, 160 Bromley Road, Catford, London SE6 2NZ

7 thoughts on “Anger over plan to ban through-traffic in some Lewisham streets

  • Christopher Mahon

    How can an area be cut in half when you can walk or bike through it. It is busy roads that cut places in half.

    It you want to talk about cut in half, go to Catford town centre and see the effect of the A21 and A205.

    Also has to be said, the more car dependent you are for short journeys in your neighbourhood, the less fit and more car dependent you will become. Residential streets should be safe places to play on for kids. It’s only the past 10 years on my road that’s seen it turn in to a massive car park.

    It’s time for pedestrians to speak up for cleaner air and safer roads. I hope their find their voice and aren’t drowned out.

    Reply
  • Matthew Richards

    Christopher Mahon, there are thousands of people who can’t just cycle or walk for mile after mile. Please don’t write them off as ‘less fit’. The elderly, disabled, those who are ill, or pregnant, or taking a baby you a medical appointment, the list goes on.

    These plans will force people to take longer car journeys, which increases pollution and carbon emissions, and makes local residents needlessly waste time and money. No wonder so many Lewisham voters are angry.

    The councillors need to change their minds.

    Reply
  • Melissa dickinson

    I received letter today and am fuming. How dare they cut south of manor lane off from rest of community with only option being going onto south circular making journeys a nightmare. There are many reasons why people need to use a car – in my case picking up my disabled dad and my partner who works shifts when public transport is not working. encourage people to go electric, have 24 hour trains rather than penalise local residents for the rat runners.

    Reply
  • This is a great initiative! Every morning I fear for the life of my little boy when we have to cross Dermody Road to get to his school. People can walk or take bikes, or the bus. People can still drive but it will take longer, and that’s good. Lewisham is for people, not for cars.

    Reply
  • steven potter

    this is the most stupid idea in the world it took me 1 hour 29 minutes to get from Sydenham to grove park all my shopping defrosted and my grandson shit him self and now i have to get my car valeted thanks a lot the minute i get enough money i’m leaving London it reminds me of a cesspit.

    Reply
    • This is the most ridiculous this ever. At this point in time, why would you want to encourage people to take public transport or cycle??? I mean, who is gonna cycle when it freezing cold or pelting down with rain. People use their cars to feel safe from covid and also the maniacs on the street. No matter what you do, people will NEVER stop driving. If they had better roads and built bridges, there wouldnt be so much traffic and people wouldnt need to take the back roads everywhere. Mayor of London is useless, i bet he doesnt cycle much or take public transport!

      Reply
  • The bus gate design at Manor Park Lewisham does not Comply with The Traffic Signs Manual 2019 chapter 3 para 9.7.9 with regard to a least 5 requirements

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.