£500m Lambeth tower blocks plan is approved to the dismay of residents who homes are overshadowed

BY GRAINNE CUFFE
toby@slpmedia.co.uk

Residents whose homes will be overshadowed by a £500 million development up to 26 storeys high shouted “shame on you” after it was voted through.

Developer U + I, in partnership with the London Fire Commissioner (LFC), plans to build 443 flats and a 200–room hotel to revamp Lambeth Fire Station and build a new London Fire Brigade (LFB) Museum at 8 Albert Embankment.

The site houses LFB’s former headquarters, which was opened in July 1937 to replace the old headquarters in Southwark.

After a three-and-a-half-hour debate in a packed committee room , the vote was tied at three to three – and the chairman’s casting vote approved the plan.

Objectors, representing residents in nearby flats, implored councillors to reject the plans because of the loss of daylight they would suffer.

But despite having concerns about the development, three councillors said the benefits outweighed the potential negative impact.

The main arguments in favour were that it was “better” than the previous appeal and that it would provide homes.

A planning officer compared the loss of light to nearby Eustace House, which had a tall building erected beside it 20 years ago.

But one audience member said he moved out of that block because he developed depression, and warned councillors not to “make the same mistake”.

To build the two towers included in the plans – 26 and 24 storeys in height – would be a departure from policy in the borough.

Lambeth’s local plan states it would support development that “relates in height and bulk to the adjacent townscape, taking into account the height, massing and scale of neighbouring buildings, and the historic built form of the area”.

It states: “The heritage sensitivity of the site makes it inappropriate for tall building development.”

One resident, representing the Whitgift Estate TRA and Lambeth Village, a residents’ network of the surrounding area, told the committee that their online petition had gained 3,000 signatures, ten times that of the comments of support on the planning application.

A single father-of-three, who lives on the ground floor of Whitgift House and would be “one of the most affected” by loss of light, said there were 12 children on the same floor, three of whom are disabled.

He said: “I have a disabled son who needs care and good quality housing.
“We live in our homes, not like all the empty flats on the Embankment – we council tenants don’t get to choose where we live, or have the money to move.

“Forty per cent (daylight) is twice the amount we should lose. You should protect us with the Lambeth Plan, it says no towers, there should be no towers.”

According to planning officers’ projections, those on the ground floor would be “majorly” affected by loss of light.

The director of the Garden Museum said residents have been “lied to” about the impact of the development.

He said: “The education centre which you gave £300,000 towards is not on the lighting studies and technical studies presented by U + I.

“Each tall tower will cast shadows in our gardens which were built to face the sun, sunlight we thought protected by the local plan.”

He added the centre, which could have been built elsewhere, was “built in trust of Lambeth’s planning policy”.

Deputy chief executive of U+I, Richard Upton, said the redevelopment of the site had been “a long time in the making”.

He said: “We’ve worked very hard with LFB to ensure the proposals are radically different (from the failed appeal), having listened to and consulted very carefully with the community,” adding there was a “silent majority” who supported the plans.

Andy Roe, deputy commissioner of LFB, said Lambeth fire station was in a “key location” for fires and emergencies across London.

He said: “It helps deliver some of the fastest response times in London to Lambeth. It now requires very significant modernisation to keep up high operational standards.”

It emerged through councilllors’ questions that to qualify for the shared ownership affordable housing on the site, residents would have to earn twice the average Lambeth salary and that fire engine access was problematic and had not been finalised.

Cllr Tim Windle, who voted for the development, said he had concerns about heritage but the plans posed “less than substantial harm” and approved of the “higher than normal provision of affordable housing” – 40 per cent.

Cllr Ben Kind, who opposed the development, said he had “quite considerable problems with the application”, including loss of light, lack of servicing facilities, and accessibility to the site.

Deputy Commissioner and Director of Operations, Andy Roe, said: “These proposals will ensure we can keep Lambeth residents safe long into the future, with a much-needed refurbishment of Lambeth fire station – one of the busiest in London.

The plans will deliver improved accommodation and workspace for firefighters, as well as provide bigger and better training facilities.

“The plans for 8 Albert Embankment will not only help to keep residents safe but ensure London Fire Brigade remains at the heart of Lambeth’s community.”

Karen McCormick, Senior Development Manager at U+I, said: “The scheme will provide new public spaces through the site including a central square that will serve as a focal point for the community.

“The redevelopment of this site has been a long time in the making, and we firmly believe that our joint proposals with London Fire Brigade will deliver huge social and economic benefit to the local community in Lambeth and London more widely”.