LewishamNews

50,000 sign petition to save 100-year-old oak trees from the chop

By Grainne Cuffe, Local Democracy Reporter

More than 50,000 people have signed a petition to save century-old oak trees in Lewisham.

People are desperate to save the 100-year-old oaks in Moremead Road, but the council says the trees are causing a nearby home to sink into the ground.

Residents are demanding the council provides proof of its claims before the beloved trees are cut down.

The local authority says a third party has the evidence – so it can’t share the results.

Aiga Maras explained her children and others often play under the trees.

The mum said: “The council still keeps saying it did everything they could but we didn’t get any details.

“We wanted documents to say what was done to save the trees but they’re just not showing us.

“They said the reports were done by a third party and not theirs to share, but how does that work when the trees are on public land?

“It’s public land so the public should be able to see the reports.”

Messages have been pinned to the trees

She said residents enjoy looking at the trees every day, that they provide shade, and children play under them.

Aiga says the community got together recently for a little party on the grass during the hot weather.

She continued: “All the kids were playing and we all took shade under the trees.

“But it’s much bigger than that, this is an environmental issue as well. The trees do so much.”

Other residents said they would be very sad to see the “big old beautiful” trees go.

Lydia Morley said: “It was sad to see when the signs went up. The council is being quite cagey about which property is the one affected.

“People would be more understanding if they had the evidence to prove it.”

The 33-year-old added that the replacement trees the council is planning will take 100 years to get the value back.

The council put up a notice about two months ago giving 28 days’ notice before the trees are cut down, but is yet to make the move.

A spokesman for the council said: “Lewisham council regret that despite the best efforts of our tree services team and the actions they have taken to save two oak trees implicated in subsidence of a nearby property in Moremead Road, we have been left with no option but to remove them.

“Since the first report of subsidence by the property owner in 2016, we have explored all options for retaining the trees.

“After a detailed study, we cut back the branches and leaves of both trees by 50 per cent to significantly reduce the amount of moisture each tree needed.

“We also considered introducing barriers to stem the spread of the trees’ roots but we ruled this out because it would only provide a temporary and not a long-term solution.

“Meanwhile, further reports of subsidence at the nearby property have been reported.

“We have a legal duty to take all reasonable steps to prevent damage occurring to a third party’s property.

“We will be planting more trees on the green where these oaks are being removed and we are working with the residents to select the species of these.”

Pictured top: The trees in Moremead Road, Lewisham


Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Everyone at the South London Press thanks you for your continued support.

Former Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick has encouraged everyone in the country who can afford to do so to buy a newspaper, and told the Downing Street press briefing:

“A FREE COUNTRY NEEDS A FREE PRESS, AND THE NEWSPAPERS OF OUR COUNTRY ARE UNDER SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL PRESSURE”

If you can afford to do so, we would be so grateful if you can make a donation which will allow us to continue to bring stories to you, both in print and online. Or please make cheques payable to “MSI Media Limited” and send by post to South London Press, Unit 112, 160 Bromley Road, Catford, London SE6 2NZ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.