Objections to plan to burn more rubbish at incinerator

By Tara O’Connor, Local Democracy Reporter

Hundreds of residents have objected to plans for thousands more tons of rubbish to be burnt at an incinerator.

They fear pollution could increase and it would see more lorries driving through their neighbourhoods.

Bosses at the Beddington Incinerator have applied to the Environment Agency to burn 34,864 more tons of waste.

Viridor, which runs the site, wants to increase capacity to 382,286 tonnes a year.

Public consultation on the plans is set to close tomorrow.

So far more than 320 people have responded to the consultation, with many mentioning fears about air quality and extra lorries carrying rubbish to be processed.

One Merton homeowner wrote: “As someone who is pregnant, I want to ensure that I am protecting my children from unnecessary toxic air pollution by burning more waste and increasing traffic.”

Another claimed that their asthma had worsened since living in Hackbridge.

They said: “I think it is appalling this is happening in such a busy area with multiple schools.

“It is bad enough without them burning more. My asthma has significantly increased since moving to Hackbridge.”

The incinerator, also called the Energy Recovery Facility (ERF), burns rubbish which would otherwise go to landfill.

The process produces energy which powers the facility and supplies the rest to the National Grid.

It processes the rubbish of Merton, Kingston, Croydon and Sutton, which make up the South London Waste Partnership.

The partnership has objected to the plans saying that when the incinerator was approved there was no mention of the permit increasing in the future.

It said: “Residents of the SLWP region, and Beddington and surrounding areas in particular, are now asking why they should bear the brunt of more waste being trucked in from across London and further afield when the residual waste treatment needs of their boroughs are already being met.”

It adds that it fears the additional waste could mean more breaches to the emissions as this year it has breached its current emissions permit a number of times.

A spokesperson for Viridor said: “We have applied to England’s environmental regulator, the Environment Agency, to make variations to our environmental permit to enable enhanced operations at the Beddington Energy Recovery Facility (ERF).

“This variation is being submitted following extensive reviews of the performance of the Beddington ERF which have concluded that it has ability to treat additional waste safely and in full compliance with the site permit.

“The emissions limits applied to the permit will remain unchanged under this variation.

“As a region, the South East and greater London area continues to see an increase in residual waste volumes with large quantities either being exported to European ERF’s or directed to UK landfill.

“If approved this variation will enable waste to move higher up the waste hierarchy by diverting it away from landfill, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and produce vital energy from what remains.”

Pictured top: More rubbish could be burnt at the incinerator (Picture: Wikimedia Commons/Mahdikarimi70)

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Everyone at the South London Press thanks you for your continued support.

Former Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick has encouraged everyone in the country who can afford to do so to buy a newspaper, and told the Downing Street press briefing:


If you can afford to do so, we would be so grateful if you can make a donation which will allow us to continue to bring stories to you, both in print and online. Or please make cheques payable to “MSI Media Limited” and send by post to South London Press, Unit 112, 160 Bromley Road, Catford, London SE6 2NZ

One thought on “Objections to plan to burn more rubbish at incinerator

  • As the Environment Agency issues permits for incinerators because of the assumption of Public Health England and predecessor bodies, perhaps they’ll be willing to comment on the post-incinerator rises in the rates of infant mortality in the councils exposed to emissions? After the SELCHP incinerator started operating in 1993, the rates of infant mortality, stillbirths and percentages of low birth weight babies all suddenly rose in the Boroughs of Lewisham, Newham and Tower Hamlets. The asthma death rate in Lewisham also rose to above the London average after SELCHP started operating.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.