Charlton AthleticSport

Two days for Charlton to defend charges which could set them back almost 40 years

The EFL has confirmed it is investigating the January takeover of Charlton by East Street Investments.

The consortium, headed by Tahnoon Nimer, paid former owner Roland Duchatelet £1 for the club, with an agreement to pay a further £55m to purchase remaining assets including the stadium and training ground. The deadline for the payment has not been confirmed.

Majority shareholder Nimer, based in Abu Dhabi, has still yet to satisfy EFL requests for proof and source of funding.

The EFL said: “The EFL has commenced formal investigations to ascertain whether breaches of EFL Regulations and/or other misconduct occurred in relation to the takeover of Charlton Athletic in January 2020.”

Nimer, who took control in March after ousting executive chairman Matt Southall and another director, Jonathan Heller, is now being investigated, along with Southall and Heller.

Nimer said in a statement confirmed this evening by Charlton: “I can confirm that I have received correspondence from the EFL and I have already provided an initial response and intend to co-operate fully with them in order to ensure clarity on this matter. Mr Southall liaised with the previous solicitors throughout this process. I do not believe I should make any further comment on this at this stage.”

All parties have been asked to provide any information relating to the takeover and in particular the timeline of events regarding the transfer of shares and roles taken in the running of the club.

They have until Wednesday to respond.

Nimer had promised to invest funds in the club this month – and told manager Lee Bowyer he will honour that commitment.

But the EFL could deduct Charlton as many as 12 points if misconduct is proven – virtually guaranteeing relegation, with nine games to go.

Another risk is that Nimer might not be able to pay the £55million to Duchatelet, who would become the de facto owner of The Valley and the club’s Sparrow’s Lane training ground. 

That would leave the Addicks in the precarious position of not owning their stadium. That scenario would give fans deja vu after then-chairman Michael Gliksten sold the club in 1982 but kept the ground, leading to seven years of exile from 1985, first at Selhurst Park; and then a year-and-a half at West Ham’s then-ground, Upton Park, before their return in December 1992.


Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Everyone at the South London Press thanks you for your continued support.

Former Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick has encouraged everyone in the country who can afford to do so to buy a newspaper, and told the Downing Street press briefing:


If you can afford to do so, we would be so grateful if you can make a donation which will allow us to continue to bring stories to you, both in print and online. Or please make cheques payable to “MSI Media Limited” and send by post to South London Press, Unit 112, 160 Bromley Road, Catford, London SE6 2NZ

5 thoughts on “Two days for Charlton to defend charges which could set them back almost 40 years

  • Clucking Bell.

  • Clive Sangster

    This is just a recurring night mare. What have we done to deserve this continued shameful destruction of this club. A family friendly club being taken to the cleaners by owners who couldn’t care less about CAFC, Its no good the EFL looking in to the ownership now they should have done there job properly years ago when Duchalet got involvedm

  • Gerald kite

    Who is investigating EFL?

  • Malcolm Scott

    Feel for CAFC supporters. Many owners don’t give a flying one about heritage and supporters.

    • Just more parasites involved in Charlton Ath no interest in the club or the most honest fans that u could wish for,these parasites will finish this club once and for, they have no conscious or morals,just a bunch of thieves
      May the fester in Hell


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.